Answer: Attila
Some extra relevant information:
The title “Last of the Romans” holds great significance as it refers to individuals who embody the classical Roman way of thinking. However, there are certain individuals who would not exemplify this title due to their departure from traditional Roman values and principles.
One such individual who would not fit the description of the “Last of the Romans” would be Emperor Nero, who reigned from 54 to 68 AD. Despite being born in Rome, Nero displayed a complete disregard for Roman ideals and traditions. He was notorious for his extravagance, self-indulgence, and cruelty. Nero’s reign was marked with scandals, including his alleged involvement in the murder of his own mother and the persecution of Christians. His actions demonstrated a complete detachment from the virtues that defined the classical Roman way of thinking, such as honor, duty, and integrity.
Furthermore, Emperor Commodus, who ruled from 180 to 192 AD, would also not be considered the “Last of the Romans.” Commodus was known for his hedonistic lifestyle and his obsession with gladiatorial combat. He showed little interest in the affairs of the state and often prioritized his personal pursuits over the wellbeing of the empire. His rule marked a departure from the strong leadership and disciplined approach that defined classical Rome.
In conclusion, individuals like Emperor Nero and Emperor Commodus would not be considered the “Last of the Romans” due to their abandonment of classical Roman values and principles. The title is reserved for those who emulate the traditional Roman way of thinking, characterized by honor, duty, and integrity.